Where is veto power described

The content of this veto message and vetoed bill provide additional evidence of the separation of powers and checks and balances. Referring to the "deeply rooted" "constitutional principle" of separation of powers, President Nixon explains that he is exercising the veto because S.

He maintains that the Presidential power to remove executive officers is "an exclusive power that cannot be infringed upon by the Congress. Read the Background Information for Teachers to see an overview of the Constitutional clauses which delineate the veto process and a description of the text or markings in the documents which illustrate the process in action.

Direct students to define "veto" and "veto override. Ask students to locate in the document evidence of each of the steps in the veto process as described in Article I, Section 7, clause 2 of the Constitution. Use Worksheet 1 to identify the steps and locate the evidence.

Refer to the Background Information for Teachers for assistance identifying all parts of the process. Evaluate the success of the veto and veto override powers as one of the "checks and balances" embedded into the Constitution.

What did the Founders hope to accomplish by including these powers? Could that goal have been reached in a more effective manner? If so, how? How could these powers be abused? Have these powers been abused in the past? Grant 45 48 93 4 45th—46th Rutherford B.

Hayes 12 1 13 1 47th James A. Arthur 4 8 12 1 49th—50th Grover Cleveland 2 51st—52nd Benjamin Harrison 19 25 44 1 53rd—54th Grover Cleveland 42 5 55th—57th William McKinley 6 36 Taft 30 9 39 1 63rd—66th Woodrow Wilson 33 11 44 6 67th Warren G. Harding 5 1 Hoover 21 16 37 3 73rd—79th Franklin D. Roosevelt 9 79th—82nd Harry S. Truman 70 12 83rd—86th Dwight D. Eisenhower 73 2 87th—88th John F.

Kennedy 12 9 Johnson 16 14 Nixon 26 17 43 7 93rd—94th Gerald R. The cancellation would take effect upon receipt by Congress of a special message from the President. Congress could "override" the line-item veto by enacting a disapproval bill that would make the cancellation message null and void.

On June 25, , the U. Gallet, 43 Idaho , P. Vilsack, N. Louisiana: Henry v. Edwards, So. Ohio Gen. Assembly v. Brunner, Ohio St. Beasley, S. Thompson, U. Risser and David Travis v. Tommy G. Thompson, F. Thompson, Wis.