Why does the aspca kill animals

You are here About Us Policies and Positions. Position Statement on Euthanasia. Share this page:. The ASPCA will soon petition in court for legal custody of the animals, and hopes all will be adopted. Their number could reach when the operation is complete, Rickey said. That would be the second-largest companion animal rescue in the history of the ASPCA, which saved more than cats in Florida in , a spokeswoman said.

The organization also once rescued 4, chickens in a cockfighting raid. The ASPCA allowed the AP to visit the animals on the condition that their exact location not be reported, to avoid security problems for the staff and the animals, which need at least a month of care before any are ready to be adopted, spokeswoman Natasha Whitling said.

Share story. But more than all of that — most important of all — it is a history that though infuriating, heartbreaking, and even, at times, utterly wearying, never stopped those of us in the No Kill movement from fighting back again and again until ultimately, we succeeded.

Have a comment? Join the discussion by clicking here. Nathan J Winograd. Winograd Comments Closed. Fought legislation in California to save more animals, saying shelter directors should not be second guessed. Refused to respond to animal cruelty calls, allowing dogs to starve all over New York City where it is located. Killed Max, a traumatized dog, despite an offer by a rescue group to save her.

Allowed a cat with a broken leg to sit at their facility without any medical care for 2. Sent underweight dogs to an abusive pound to be killed. They were. Sent staff door to door in a communities where it was not located with a dog wearing an adoption vest pretending it was the local shelter to raise money.

Employees were instructed to lie to people. Covered up animal abuse by its own staff that led to injury and death at its animal hospital. No-kill is a catchy phrase, full of meaning and emotion — it represents an idea all animal lovers wish could be true. The organization that coined it initially used it for marketing, to separate its work from other shelters and rescues.

But since its creation, the term has changed the way people view the animal welfare world. Unfortunately, shelters in some communities still face the heartbreaking decision to euthanize healthy, well-behaved animals.

No one seeks a job in an animal shelter with the goal of euthanizing dogs and cats. These organizations face extreme conditions of animal overpopulation and lack the resources and space to care for all the animals that are left on their doorsteps. The best way to support these shelters and help the animals in their care is to help them, not judge or punish them. Their worth and worthiness should be based on more than a percentage.

The actual number of animals placed should be celebrated, not just the percentage. One of the most important factors impacting placement is whether an organization is open admission or limited admission. Limited admission and open admission are simply two different operating philosophies. Neither is better than the other and both serve animals to the best of their abilities. When limited admission shelters are unable to help an animal, open admission shelters help fill in the gap.